(i) Modus Ponens: A rule of inference which states that if a hypothetical, “If p, then q”, is true, and the antecedent “p” is true, then the consequent, “q” is true. In variable notation, the rule appears in the form:
(ii) Modus Tollens: A rule of inference which states that if a hypothetical, “If p, then q”, is true, and the consequent “q” is false, then the antecedent “p” is false. In variable notation, the rule appears in the form:
Explanatory Note: The hypothetical informs us that the truth of p implies the truth of q. This being the case, if p isn’t true, then q can’t be true either, due to the fact that the hypothetical links the truth of p to that of q (Modus Ponens). On the other hand, if q isn’t true, since the truth of p ensures the truth of q, then p can’t be true (Modus Tollens).
(i) Modus Ponens: This rule occurs when (a) every member of a certain category A is a member of another category B, and (b) that some thing(s) C is/are member(s) of category A. It follows that C is/are member(s) of category B.
(ii) Modus Tollens: This rule occurs when (a) every member of a certain category A is a member of another category B, and (b) that some thing(s) C is/are not members of category B. It follows that C is/are not member(s) of category A.
It becomes clear that these versions of Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens are quite similar to the ones introduced in section 2. “All A’s are B’s,” means “If something is an A, then it is a B.” For Modus Ponens, if something specific, C, is an A, it follows that C is a B. We can also visualize these with Euler circles. Here is Modus Ponens:
As one can see, all A’s are B’s here, and all C’s are A’s. It follows that all C’s are B’s! Now, here is Modus Tollens:
Here, we see that all A’s are B’s, and that no C’s are B’s. It follows that no C’s are A’s!