Within the following section, we will be looking through a couple of examples depicting uses of Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens.
Activity: Take the two short paragraphs, which each represent an example of the law of Modus Ponens. In each case, identify the hypothetical compound proposition, and determine which portion is the antecedent, and which is the consequent.
1. (1) If Johnny is a lawyer, then Johnny studies the law (if p, then q)
(2) Johnny is a lawyer (p)
(3) Therefore, Johnny studies the law (therefore, q)
2. (1) All men are mortal (All A’s are B’s)
(2) Socrates is a man (C is an A)
(3) Therefore, Socrates is mortal (C is a B)
Activity: Come up with 2-3 real world examples of reasoning using Modus Ponens; discuss these with a classmate to make sure they are actually representative. Try to put these examples into the form of a syllogism.
1. (1) If Newton was right about everything, then he would have no false theories (if p, then q)
(2) He has false theories (not-q)
(3) Therefore, Newton was not right about everything (therefore, not-p)
2. (1) All chickens are animals (All A’s are B’s)
(2) No robots are animals (C is not a B)
(3) Therefore, robots are not chickens (therefore, C is not an A)
Activity: As before, come up with 2-3 real world examples of reasoning using Modus Tollens; discuss these with a classmate to make sure they are actually representative. Try to put these examples into the form of a syllogism.